In this Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS, we will discuss the differences between Amazon S3, EBS, and EFS. When using the Amazon S3 plugin, we still make use of EFS but most of the traffic throughput will be shifted to Amazon S3. As an example of the cost optimization EFS IA provides let’s look at storage costs for 100 terabytes (100TB) of data. Which is costlier EFS or EBS? Amazon EFS is almost 10 times more expensive than Amazon EBS pricing, but the cheaper Amazon EBS can only be accessed by one Amazon EC2 instance at a time. The full form of Amazon EFS is Amazon Elastic File System. ($0. The EFS Standard storage class is currently charged at $0. Key differences: EBS: Block Storage. Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service that can be accessed from anywhere. 0133$ per GB a month for one-zone storage. Data upload and download fee: $0. The storage cost of gp3 is on average 20% less than gp2 ($0. EBS vs. While some may select a single platform over others,. 022, saving you a dollar per TB. EFS stands for Elastic File System and is a file-level storage option for use with AWS. However, choosing a storage option is not easy since each of them has unique features and costs. US East (Ohio) Within your first 12 months on AWS, you can use up to 5 GB/month on the EFS Standard storage class at no charge. 023 per GB Per month through first 50 TB, then the price goes down. It’s a highly reliable and secure storage solution and a great option for creating large backups for data recovery. What is AWS EFS vs S3? The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. 1 What. Getting the best performance out of Amazon EFS. Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) vs. Two…For AWS US East (N. S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. $0. Working with the suite of AWS services requires making a lot of choices. EC2 Auto Scaling automatically increases or decreases the number of required EC2 instances depending. $0. The estimation factors in typical data compression savings of 50%, and provisions the persistent file system with 1,200 GB of storage capacity and per unit storage throughput of 50 MB/s/TiB. These include other AWS services such as Amazon S3 and Amazon EFS. Cost savings: Using S3 to store data helps the users save costs and ensure a high level of. 005 per 1000 PUT, POST, and LIST requests, and $0. · DevOps Explore the AWS storage options: Elastic Block Storage (EBS), Elastic File System (EFS), and Simple Storage Service (S3). S3, EBS, EFS. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. For S3 Intelligent-Tiering, there is an additional charge of $0. 05 per 1,000 requests. Depending on your needs, EFS offers two storage classes: Infrequent Access and Standard Access. It allows users to store and retrieve files. Cost. 045 per GB-month, less than half the price of gp2. AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3. Keep in mind that each service has a different cost structure, and thus your choice of storage service impacts cost optimization in AWS. Cost Implications: S3’s Intelligent Tiering is cost-effective for varied access patterns. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8. AWS Transfer Family is a fully managed AWS service that could be leveraged to transfer files in and out of Amazon S3 or Amazon EFS over the following protocols: AWS Transfer Family supports up to. 1)For Video streaming am planning to use Nodejs and S3 but the point is, if a video is 1. S3 is object storage. EFS Standard tier storage costs $0. PDF RSS. 08/GB-month vs $0. EFS is a file storage service for use with Amazon compute (EC2, containers, serverless) and on-premises servers. In this Ec2 instance use the key created in Step 2 and the security group which has been created in Step 1. Amazon S3 Standard Infrequent Access C. B. Free Tier — 5 GB storage, 20000 Get Requests, 2000 Put Requests. 30 per GB for EFS vs. EFS Standard tier storage costs $0. AWS SFTP pricing can be broken down as such: Endpoint fee: $0. Performance: AWS file storage solutions are optimized for performance and can deliver high throughput and low-latency access to data, making. 14 You almost can't compare EFS and S3 because they are two very different things, even though there is some overlap in their functionality, or at least their apparent. Bash. Amazon offers two standard classes of file system storage in EFS: Standard and Infrequent Access storage class (EFS Standard-IA). Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8. Part 3: A practical example, including reusable code and commands, of a containerized application deployed on ECS tasks. It is used to provide the block-level storage volumes for the use of EC2 instances. Step 1: Create an EFS from the AWS console. When you copy objects containing file system metadata back to file formats, the original file metadata (that DataSync copied to S3) is restored. Option Two If your data is highly compressible and reducing the cost from $100 to $30 a year matters then you could have a lambda fetch the data, do the compression, and write to S3 deep archive. Another low-redundancy option of this storage class is Amazon S3 Reduced Redundancy Storage, or RRS. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier: which is better? Base your decision on 12 verified in-depth peer reviews and ratings, pros & cons, pricing, support and more. When copying data to Amazon S3, DataSync automatically converts each file to a single S3 object in a 1:1 relationship, and preserves POSIX metadata from NFS shares or HDFS as Amazon S3 object metadata. In your opinion, does it make sense to use Amazon EFS for database backup from a cost perspective? 2. 30/GB-month while S3 is $0. Data on S3 is served over HTTP (s) to your machines. 021-0. AWS EFS vs EBS Multi-Attach. S3 is a blob storage, with no structure, no data types, items can't be updated only replaced. Create an EFS file system using Amazon EFS Quick Create. Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud storage pricing varies depending on which of the three storage services you use—object storage (S3), block storage (EBS), or file storage (EFS). For performance, Amazon EBS is the fastest due to high IOPS, but when it comes to shared. S3 does not support NFS. There is no charge for Data Transfer between Amazon EC2 and Amazon S3 in the same region. All of these can already be centrally controlled. One allows you to run servers in the cloud with minimal effort on your part, while the other is designed for storing large amounts of static data and ideal for data backups. However, Infrequent Access is generally used if you're storing data on EFS that is rarely accessed. S3 Standard IA. 04 and Azure is $0. AWS storage types across file, block and object-- including Simple Storage Service (S3), FSx, Elastic File System (EFS) and Elastic Block Store (EBS) -- vary sharply by features, management and performance. 2. Amazon AWS has termed it as S3 storage while Microsoft Azure storage calls its offering as blob storage. This post on stack is also a good read AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3 (differences & when to use?)The example is focused on costs directly related to EFS Replication. When should I use Amazon EFS vs. When an application requires a shared file system that is not I/O sensitive and requires POSIX compliance (so it can provide file permissions, for example). The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "A solution with good technical support that needs to improve its stability". The evolution of such a migration is to move the files to S3 which is a more scalable and cost-effective solution. Make the right choice for each workload. Không giống như EBS hoặc EFS, S3 không bị giới hạn ở EC2. Single-part upload. Cost Considerations: Evaluate the cost implications of each service based on your storage and access patterns. S3 organizes data in a hierarchy with metadata and it allows to run more complex queries on objects compared to EBS and EFS. Updated: September 2023. In terms of security, both AWS EFS and Azure File Storage offer robust security measures. You pay for all bandwidth into and out of Amazon S3, except for. There are multiple storage classes available in Amazon S3. You choose a class depending on your use case. Although this storage has the same availability SLA of 99. : EFS is NFS. Amazon web services are widely used around the world for storage options. I have a couple of questions below: 1. Sure, there’s a deeper price comparison between Amazon EFS and EBS: Amazon EFS pricing: Standard storage: $0. AWS FSx for Lustre vs EFS: Head to Head FSx for Lustre is an entirely managed service that offers high-performance, scalable, cost-effective storage for compute workloads. Let’s say that you temporarily restore the 200 GB snapshot from the archive tier for a period of 15 days. With a few clicks in the Amazon Management Console, you can create file systems that are accessible to Amazon EC2 instances via a file system interface (using standard operating system file I/O APIs) and support full. 065 per month. But even within a single AZ, completely eliminating data replication costs, the total cost of ownership was $6,377. Much like Amazon S3 and Glacier, there are different storage classes within EFS, not as many, however, they can help you save a lot of money if used correctly. That is my personal feeling to the circumstance = EFS is the best solution that is the easiest to maintain. This means that even if you attach a dozen instances to it, you will pay the same price as if you simply attached one. But it’s worth considering the cost of EFS (GB/month, no bandwidth and request charges) vs S3 (bandwidth, request and GB/month) for your specific workload. To keep you on top of your data, AWS allows you to set up monitoring for your storage in seconds. Overall, S3 is best suited for storing large amounts of unstructured data, EBS is best for use with EC2 instances as storage, and EFS is best for file storage and sharing among multiple EC2 instances or ECS containers. Amazon Glacier with Expedited retrievals B. Chose Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) S3 and EBS/EFS both host files, but they are very different. 1/Month: $0. S3 doesn't immediately guarantee consistency. Amazon Elastic File System costs. EFS: It allows us to mount the FS across multiple regions and instances (accessible from multiple EC2 instances). EBS: $0. For more information, see Mounting EFS file systems. 5. S3 Standard is designed for more than 99. 021-0. 03. Provide the Bucket, key, and Body and use the "putObject" method to upload the file in a single part. Amazon FSx lets you choose between four widely-used file systems: Lustre, NetApp ONTAP, OpenZFS, and Windows File Server. Offers cost-saving storage classes ideal for infrequently access data or for data archival; provides unlimited storageThere are two types of ML inferencing architectures, single model and multi-model. However, choosing a storage option is not easy since each of them has unique features. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 31 reviews. 8X to 4. There are also native storage options available, such as temporary storage or Lambda layers. 1/Month (depends on speed – SSD or not) + IOPS costs; EFS: $0. Details are available at: Amazon S3 Simple Storage Service Pricing - Amazon Web Services S3 Standard storage (2. Share. com Serverless File System | Amazon Elastic File System Pricing | AWS Products Storage Amazon EFS Amazon EFS Pricing Get started for free Request a pricing quote Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is designed to provide serverless, fully elastic file storage that helps you share file data without provisioning or managing storage capacity and performance. EFS is at best a hack that could work, but would have major issues both in scalability as well as cost. S3 Standard Storage. Amazon EFS simplifies scaling storage for you. Create a bucket policy that limits access to only the application tier running in the VPC. The model is stored either in S3, ECR (via OCI deployment with Lambda), or EFS and is then used by a compute service such as Lambda. Azure Blob, you need to consider the type of business that you are running. The other most popular file storage services provided by AWS are EBS and S3. • Baseline performance of 3 IOPS per GB for. What is the difference between EBS vs EFS vs S3? The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. For example, transitioning data from S3 Standard to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access will be charged $0. EFS would $60/month for 200GB to store the data, but $4. 045-0. It depends on your specific use-cases and softwares but here's some basic guideline. The only thing you pay extra on S3 is 0. EFS is Elastic File Storage its a shared storage provided by AWS we can attach 1 EFS with multiple Ec2 instances. Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP, OpenZFS, Windows File Server, and Lustre. Costs 20% less than S3 Standard-IA; Designed for 99. One last note, these settings may be enough for many WordPress installations but in some cases, you have to optimize further. That's why it includes the 86400 calculation. 025 per GB per month. To do this when creating a file system using the console, choose Availability and Durability, and then choose One Zone. Example: How Alpha Vertex uses EFS. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) now supports Intelligent-Tiering, a new capability that makes it easier for you to optimize costs for shared file storage, even when access patterns change. EFS is a file storage service for use with Amazon compute (EC2, containers, serverless) and on-premises servers. EBS is block, EFS is file, S3 is object. 3/Month. ถาม: เมื่อใดที่ฉันควรเลือกใช้ระหว่าง Amazon EFS กับ Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) หรือ Amazon S3. When you create a server in the AWS Transfer Family console, select Amazon EFS as your storage service in the Step 4 section Choose a domain. $ 0. Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service that can be accessed from anywhere. EBS is a high-performance per-instance block storage system designed to act as storage for a single EC2 instance (most of the time) EFS is a highly scalable file storage system designed to provide flexible storage for multiple EC2 instances. A cost-performance comparison of AWS EBS volume types: magnetic EBS volume, general purpose SSD EBS volume and provisioned IOPS (PIOPS) EBS volume. Especially with Amazon EFS Bursting Throughput mode, throughput on Amazon EFS scales as the size of your file system in the standard storage class grows. This means that your backup storage for these resources is billed for the whole day. NOTE : if you want to access your data on ebs or efs you would need to spin up an ec2 instance which also add cost. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8. The table below shows a high level comparison of the different retrieval options. Mount your EFS file system if it is not already mounted on the EC2 instance. 6, while Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 7. AWS offers a complete range of services for you to store, access, govern, and analyze your data to reduce costs, increase agility, and accelerate innovation. More importantly, it charges you per-transaction; Every GET, PUT, DELETE, etc. It provides a file system interface, file system access semantics (such as strong consistency and file locking), and concurrently-accessible storage for up to thousands of Amazon EC2 instances. SC1 HDD → Lowest cost per GB of all EBS volume types. , random access files for an RDBMS) or used by an. 77. EBS is a device you can mount onto EC2. Regarding cost, Amazon S3 is no doubt the cheapest in terms of pure storage costs. You don’t even have to pay for files that are less accessible, and it can automatically expand when clients need more storage, and you don’t have to pay. How is the answer - "Cost of test file storage on S3 Standard < Cost of test file storage on EFS < Cost of test file storage on EBS". So when you hear or read about EBS, think “EC2 storage. As per the title of this question, what are the practical differences between AWS EFS, EBS and S3? My understanding of each:. ”. 3/Month: scalability: Scalable: Hardly scalable: Scalable: Interface: Web interface: File System interface: Web and file system interface: Efficiency: Slower than EBS and EFS: Faster than S3 and EFS: Faster than S3, slower than EBS: Application: Good for storing backups: Is meant to be EC2. Navigate cloud storage with our comprehensive comparison of EFS, Amazon EBS, and S3. 025 per GB-month. 2 Use cases 2 Amazon EBS 2. Mount the file system on the application instances. Backup storage is $0. Amazon Storage Services: EFS vs EBS vs S3. AWS S3 vs EBS vs EFS: Quick Comparison. AWS offers the same durability as S3 along with data querying options; Google cold. 3/month. Amazon EBS is designed to store data in blocks (volumes of a provisioned size) attached to an Amazon EC2 instance, similar to a local disk drive on your physical machine. 023/GB/month for the first 50 Terabytes; this decreases as you consume more Terabytes of storage. That represented a 61% saving by using EFS. 10. gp3 IOPS: 3,000 IOPS free (baseline) and $0. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. Adding the charges above, your total monthly bill for the AWS Transfer Family would be: $216 + $1. Specifically in the storage arena, AWS provides three popular services — S3, Elastic Block Store (EBS), and Elastic File System (EFS). S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving and one of the best in the market today. Pricing Q&A Comparisons Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. $9,457. has a cost, so one should consider when and how many calls they make to a bucket. EBS volumes can be attached to both Windows and non-Windows EC2 machines, whereas EFS volumes are designed for Linux-based hosts only. Each object (file) in the storage contains a header with an associated sequence of bytes from 0 bytes to 5 TB. Create a bucket policy to make the objects in the S3 bucket public. There are several interesting aspects in terms of pricing. Amazon S3 is the best place to build data lakes because of its unmatched durability, availability, scalability, security, compliance, and audit capabilities. Amazon S3 Report Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Read 5 Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) reviews. AWS FSx for Lustre vs EFS: Head to Head FSx for Lustre is an entirely managed service that offers high-performance, scalable, cost-effective storage for compute workloads. 8. So if i use AWS EFS or EBS there wont be any necessity for the API call to S3. Cost-effective. In the AWS platform, cloud storage is primarily broken down into three services: Simple Storage Service (S3). 0133$ per GB a month for one-zone storage. 053. But if you code can handle S3 (download from it, use the files, upload the results), then S3 is a better option. 10 for EBS vs $0. The storage layer uses Amazon EFS with both Standard and Infrequent Access storage classes, and Intelligent-tiering enabled. Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) can host static websites without a need for a web server. Many of these have been resolved over the last couple of. And S3 would be an alternate solution if you want to download/upload the files/objects with different clients platforms like Android, iOS, Web etc. Cost for IOPS: Cost for Throughput: S3: $0. 8e+01k times 384. Amazon S3. Amazon EFS uses NFS V4. Store the data in Amazon S3 Glacier. With Amazon EFS, there are no minimum fee or setup costs, and you pay only for the storage you use. B. Amazon S3? AWS offers cloud storage services to support a wide range of storage workloads. Amazon EFS is built to scale on demand to petabytes without disrupting applications, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files. 01 per 1,000 requests. More than 700,000 data lakes run on AWS. While having options is a good thing, you need to fully. 05 per GB-month for S3 data. S3 most likely comes down to how much you are ready to pay for storage. 023 per GB, making it fairly cheap compared to EBS and EFS. Cost of Using AWS S3. 99% (as compared to Eleven 9s in Standard). 743,467 professionals have used our research since 2012. Elastic File System (EFS). 10240 * 2 * 0. 2 Use cases 3 Amazon EFS 3. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage Nearline writes "A reliable solution for long-term. 023 / GB-month. 30 * 24 hours * 30 days = $216. Scaling AWS EFS does not disrupt applications. Cloud Professional Services Rates. In the world of cloud computing, storage plays a crucial role in managing and organizing data. The following example creates the directory on the EFS file system, and changes its group to the POSIX group ID for the Transfer Family users, which is 1101 in this example. That said, increasing the costs over S3 by 10x the price for maybe 2-3 times the overall performance is a pretty tough sell. Networked file systems have inherent tradeoffs over local filesystem access—EFS doesn't change that. 20 per month. Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Agile. For large reads that can be cached in the memory cache, we see a throughput of 2. AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3 differences when to use. One last note, these settings may be enough for many WordPress installations but in some cases, you have to optimize further. Skip to content 1 (800) 804-9726; Info@CloudComputingTechnologies. 02 = $0. D. Let’s say that you temporarily restore the 200 GB snapshot from the archive tier for a period of 15 days. S3 Replication is the only method that preserves the last-modified system metadata property from the source object to the destination object. For multiple small files, EFS performance might get degraded. Elastic Block Storage (EBS). AWS EFS may provide online content, retain multiple backups, and minimize storage costs. Potential cost savings: Although you must pre-allocate your entire disk upfront, if you know how much space you need and only access your storage from one EC2 instance at a. The standard API costs for file operations per 1,000 requests is $0. 01 per GB and $0. You can access your file system from the cloud (using Amazon EKS clusters or Amazon EC2 instances), or on-premises (via AWS VPN. The cost of a Google Cloud implementation is determined by several factors, including services used and amount of resources needed. This article will talk about three common AWS storage services: Amazon Elastic Block Store (AWS EBS), Amazon Simple Storage Se. Data storage procurement decisions can significantly impact the overall cost and performance that comes with querying data. g. 20. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 38 reviews. 8. Data downloads. . The question is asking the most cost-efficient storage option, which should be Glacier. 1. AWS gives us three different storage. The throughput capacity costs $2. AWS EBS is only accessible in a single region, while multiple EFS instances can share files across multiple regions. The Takeaways. Alternatively, you might need to build key-value or blob/object storage system depending on the level of structure and retrieval you need. 04 = $5 per month = $23. EFS is file system storage, using NFSv4 protocol. Cost of backup evaluations = 3000 backup evaluations x ($1. 20 per month + 6000 IOPS = 3000 Free + 3000 * $0. Savings with Amazon EFS. 25c/GB) is replicated across the region, is instantly. 6, while Google Cloud Storage Nearline is rated 8. S3 Glacier: Low-cost storage for data archiving and long-term backup, with longer retrieval times. The core difference in the EFS vs S3 use case is EFS is designed to be attached to the file as a networked drive where as S3 is designed to be accessed via an API. It is calculated by the data copied TO and FROM S3 and EFS, which is US$0. S3. S3 is also much better for public files like images, videos, HTML/CSS files, and other web resources that are. AWS S3 vs EBS vs EFS Feature Comparison. In this blog, we will discuss EFS, EBS, and S3, and on the. Lambda provides a comprehensive range of storage options to meet the needs of web application developers. East Region, you can achieve a storage price of $0. 99% (as compared to Eleven 9s in Standard). Storage Amazon EFS When to Choose Amazon EFS Amazon EFS provides simple, scalable, elastic file storage for use with compute instances on the AWS Cloud and on. Make a GitHub repo. Object Storage vs File System vs Block Storage. That being said, s3fs has a history of performance issues. AWS EBS is only accessible in a single region, while multiple EFS instances can share files across multiple regions. With EFS lifecycle management, you can move files that have not been accessed for the duration of the lifecycle policy (7, 14, 30, 60, or 90 days) to the IA storage classes. You can seamlessly migrate, automate, and monitor your file transfer workflows by maintaining existing client-side configurations for authentication, access, and firewalls — so nothing. Solution: 3. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of IOPS and. 99% as Amazon S3 Standard Storage, it has a much lower durability of 99. 99% availability making it a very good choice for users with critical applications. 01 per GB transferred). Security: AWS S3 buckets are usable on a permission-based level that is managed through the IAM policy of the AWS account. 1 provides better performance for parallel small-file read operations (greater than 10,000 files per second) compared to NFSv4. To summarize EBS volumes are for host storage, S3 volumes are for overall storage, and EFS is used when you need network storage for computing systems. Elastic File Store – EFS is a file storage service for use with Amazon compute (EC2, containers, serverless) and on-premises servers. EFS, and explore the differences in the storage types across management, cost, performance and uses. if you were to use 1 TB of EFS Standard Storage for 15 days and 200 GB of EFS Standard Storage for the remaining 16 days of a 31 day month, your total Standard Storage would be 1,000 GB * 15 days * 24 hours/day + 200 GB * 16 days + 24 hours / day =. 99% availability by redundantly storing data across. It is used to provide the block-level storage volumes for the use of EC2 instances. AWS Snapshots: Storage Costs. Viewed 1. AWS Data Storage Service Offerings. Amazon S3: Amazon EBS: Amazon EFS: Storage Cost (US-East, for example) Amazon S3 pricing:. N/A. What does each service offer? And which one is right for your business needs? What about EC2 instance store vs EBS? This article helps explain the different. Part 2: [this blog post] A deep dive on how EFS security works in container deployments based on ECS and Fargate with some high-level considerations around regional ECS and EFS deployments best practices. If you turn on EFS Lifecycle Management then the effective cost can drop, but there are a lot of assumption in that price. After caching is enabled, there is a 5x improvement when serving static assets stored on Amazon EFS. EFS is a Network Filesystem (NFS). Amazon S3 Standard. Since EFS is a managed service, we don’t have to worry about maintaining and deploying the FS. EBS (or it's LAN-like equivalent EFS) is the only choice (out of the 2 being explored) if your file is going to be frequently updated (e. EFS, EBS, and S3 are AWS’ three different storage types that are applicable for different types of workload needs. Lets’ learn about the differences of Amazon EBS. Keep in mind, however, that when retrieving data using this tier, you incur an additional cost ($0. 0125 per GB-month * 200 GB). Cloud File System - AWS EFS. 01 per 1,000 PUT requests; Data transfer: $0. The key difference is that EBS is elastic (easily scalable and extensible) compared to a. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. EFS and S3 are designed to scale automatically. At the time, I had at least one conversation daily (or so it seemed) about File Gateway or Amazon EFS being the right solution for NFS workloads. Amazon EFS provides a simple, scalable, fully managed, elastic file system. AWS EFS vs. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage. Automatically scales as you add or remove files, with no need to provision storage capacity in advance. Total monthly restore charge = 10 GB x $0. EFS. S3 is for object storage. Basic object. 3. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 6th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 11 reviews. See data transfer out pricing for AWS Snowball and AWS Snowball Edge. 0065 per GB per month, while SSD storage cost reduces to $0. The system shrinks and grows when you remove or add files. cost: $0. You can also use a shared EFS file system to share other types of data, such as configuration files or even the state of circuit breakers. Yet despite these differences, Amazon EC2 and Amazon S3 complement each other in significant ways. 5.